Which statement about the M67 grenade radii is true?

Which statement about the M67 grenade radii is true?

• A. The kill radius is larger than the casualty radius
• B. They are equal
• C. The casualty radius is larger than the kill radius
• D. There is no defined radius

Answer: (C)

When a M67 grenade detonates, the effect is described by two practical radii: where fatalities are most likely, and a larger area where injuries can occur. The closest zone—the kill radius—represents the area with the highest chance of lethal injury. The casualty radius extends farther out, because fragments continue to travel and can cause serious injuries even at greater distances. So, while within a few meters fatalities are most probable, a much larger area can still yield non-fatal but serious wounds. This makes the casualty radius larger than the kill radius. For rough context, kill radius is commonly around 5 meters and casualty radius can extend to about 15 meters, though exact numbers can vary by source.

When a M67 grenade detonates, the effect is described by two practical radii: where fatalities are most likely, and a larger area where injuries can occur. The closest zone—the kill radius—represents the area with the highest chance of lethal injury. The casualty radius extends farther out, because fragments continue to travel and can cause serious injuries even at greater distances. So, while within a few meters fatalities are most probable, a much larger area can still yield non-fatal but serious wounds. This makes the casualty radius larger than the kill radius. For rough context, kill radius is commonly around 5 meters and casualty radius can extend to about 15 meters, though exact numbers can vary by source.